What Bush did say on 9/30/03 is:

"If there’s a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if a person has violated the law, the person will be taken care of."

As usaul, the NYTimes is lying.
 

Does this make any sense? MSM seem to believe three things:
1. Rove = worst traitor since Benedict Arnold
2. Miller (in jail protecting “confidential” source) = patron saint of journalistic integrity
3. Believes that Rove is Miller’s source

What does this say about the press in this country when they give accolades to a women that they firmly believe is protecting the greatest traitor this country has ever had?

Additionally, one of the oldest and most “respected” of these media papers is purposefully withholding information about who they believe this “traitor” is, all the while criticizing the federal investigation for not moving fast enough to uncover information supposedly already in their possession.

I wont even get into the husband (remember: wife = super secret spy) publishing an op-ed in one of the biggest papers in the world, in which he knowing lies about the who, what, why, (but not the where), in such a way that the he knows the only way he can be shown to be a liar is for this wife’s (remember: wife = super secret spy) involvement to become known.