*=recently updated

Matthew Hoy currently works as a metro page designer at the San Diego Union-Tribune.

The opinions presented here do not represent those of the Union-Tribune and are solely those of the author.

If you have any opinions or comments, please e-mail the author at: hoystory -at- cox -dot- net.

Dec. 7, 2001
Christian Coalition Challenged
Hoystory interviews al Qaeda
Fisking Fritz
Politicizing Prescription Drugs

<< current

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A note on the Amazon ads: I've chosen to display current events titles in the Amazon box. Unfortunately, Amazon appears to promote a disproportionate number of angry-left books. I have no power over it at this time. Rest assured, I'm still a conservative.

Tuesday, July 12, 2005
Dueling editorials: In one, Bush adviser Karl Rove is the devil, in the other he's a saint.

The more accurate of the two editorials notes that former ambassador Joseph Wilson has been exposed as a liar; the other paints him as a victim -- unbelievable.

It's interesting to note that the New York Times claims that "Mr. Bush vowed to fire the leaker." I've seen the video replayed several times on various news channels of Bush's comments on this matter, but I never heard anything that sounded like a promise to "fire" the individual to blame -- someone who may not be named Karl Rove.

11:01 PM

What Bush did say on 9/30/03 is:

"If there’s a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if a person has violated the law, the person will be taken care of."

As usaul, the NYTimes is lying.
Does this make any sense? MSM seem to believe three things:
1. Rove = worst traitor since Benedict Arnold
2. Miller (in jail protecting “confidential” source) = patron saint of journalistic integrity
3. Believes that Rove is Miller’s source

What does this say about the press in this country when they give accolades to a women that they firmly believe is protecting the greatest traitor this country has ever had?

Additionally, one of the oldest and most “respected” of these media papers is purposefully withholding information about who they believe this “traitor” is, all the while criticizing the federal investigation for not moving fast enough to uncover information supposedly already in their possession.

I wont even get into the husband (remember: wife = super secret spy) publishing an op-ed in one of the biggest papers in the world, in which he knowing lies about the who, what, why, (but not the where), in such a way that the he knows the only way he can be shown to be a liar is for this wife’s (remember: wife = super secret spy) involvement to become known.
Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger Pro™