WALL STREET JOURNAL
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE
THE WEEKLY STANDARD
DRUDGE REPORT
THE WASHINGTON POST
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
NEW YORK TIMES


*=recently updated





Matthew Hoy currently works as a metro page designer at the San Diego Union-Tribune.

The opinions presented here do not represent those of the Union-Tribune and are solely those of the author.

If you have any opinions or comments, please e-mail the author at: hoystory -at- cox -dot- net.

Dec. 7, 2001
Christian Coalition Challenged
Hoystory interviews al Qaeda
Fisking Fritz
Politicizing Prescription Drugs

RSS FEED
<< current


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More













A note on the Amazon ads: I've chosen to display current events titles in the Amazon box. Unfortunately, Amazon appears to promote a disproportionate number of angry-left books. I have no power over it at this time. Rest assured, I'm still a conservative.



Tuesday, August 03, 2004
I did it: I mentioned last week that one of my colleagues at work had dismissed race-baiter and hatemonger Al Sharpton as "harmless." With Sharpton's background as the main promoter of the Tawana Brawley hoax, inciting the Crown Heights riots -- which left one Orthodox Jew dead -- and the massacre at Freddy's Fashion Mart, I found his dismissal of Sharpton's past troubling.

So, I did what I suggested I might do: I likened Sharpton to another race-baiting hatemonger: David Duke.

It didn't go over well.

First, there was the insistence that I couldn't compare Sharpton to a KKK-er. (I thought I just had.) The KKK lynched blacks. It was a terrorist group that killed people.

Yes, it was/and it is -- but I also pointed out that Sharpton too had blood on his hands. David Duke isn't harmless. Neither is Al Sharpton.

Then it came. The debate equivalent of a nuclear bomb. The use of this weapon comes when someone is losing a debate on the facts and must resort to personal attacks -- racial attacks.

I was told that I couldn't say the things I was saying about Al Sharpton in the newsroom -- as he gestured in an attempt to point out the overwhelming number of white faces. I was also told that if someone from HR (human resources) had been standing there, listening to this conversation, I would be in trouble.

Why?

I'd uttered no racial slurs. I hadn't attacked the "black community" or anything remotely similar. I hadn't praised the Ku Klux Klan -- I'd condemned it. I hadn't encouraged violence -- I'd condemned it. I hadn't called my colleague any names.

I'd compared Al Sharpton to David Duke. I'd contended that Al Sharpton was not "harmless."

And for that, I was being accused of racism. I was being barred from criticizing Sharpton because I wasn't black.

At that point I shut my mouth and walked away. You can't have an honest discussion with someone when criticizing a public figure who happens to be black (not criticizing them because they're black) is determined to be racism.

I've had numerous, honest, discussions with colleagues at work who disagree with me. Every prior discussion has honest and respectful -- until now.

The scary thing about this incident was supposition on my colleague's part that a conservative viewpoint in the newsroom was somehow beyond the pale. That uttering such views (that race-baiting hatemongers aren't harmless regardless of the color of their skin) was reason enough to bring in HR.

11:04 PM

Comments:
If he actually had to argue about it, his head would explode.

He threatened you the only way he knew how. I'm getting to the point that racist is thrown out so much now, it's lost it's magic.

Sandy P
 
Get ready - I'll bet you get written up or at least talked to about it. You threatened someone's view of reality by pointing out truth. Once they've had a day or two to stew and simmer, they'll go complain and you'll be in hot water.

Something similar happened to me several years ago.
 
HR. Remember when it was known as "Personnel"?
HR is the new Gestapo and it is exactly that BS that sent me over the edge, out of corporate life and into self-determined employment. Much happier, much more productive, and with much greater Human Resources.

Best of luck with the interrogation. Don't give 'em ANYTHING!
 
Did you expect anything less when chalanging the othodoxy of the left?

You, of all people oughta know there's only one diversity liberals don't like... that being diversity of THOUGHT. It's lockstep, or step off.

By no means am I suggesting you should back off.
You shook their foundation, Matt.

You may want to point them at Michelle Malkin's latest column.
 
Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger Pro™