WALL STREET JOURNAL
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE
THE WEEKLY STANDARD
DRUDGE REPORT
THE WASHINGTON POST
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
NEW YORK TIMES


*=recently updated





Matthew Hoy currently works as a metro page designer at the San Diego Union-Tribune.

The opinions presented here do not represent those of the Union-Tribune and are solely those of the author.

If you have any opinions or comments, please e-mail the author at: hoystory -at- cox -dot- net.

Dec. 7, 2001
Christian Coalition Challenged
Hoystory interviews al Qaeda
Fisking Fritz
Politicizing Prescription Drugs

RSS FEED
<< current


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More













A note on the Amazon ads: I've chosen to display current events titles in the Amazon box. Unfortunately, Amazon appears to promote a disproportionate number of angry-left books. I have no power over it at this time. Rest assured, I'm still a conservative.



Thursday, December 22, 2005
Definitive legal analysis: John Hinderaker over at Powerlineblog has perhaps the most in-depth and exhaustive legal analysis of presidential powers vis a vis national security and surveillance.

In brief: not illegal, not unconstitutional, not impeachable.

12:35 PM

Comments:
That is not a credible legal analysis. This is a real legal analysis:

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/lazarus/20051222.html
 
The most credible legal analysis yet:

http://www.nationalreview.com/pdf/12%2022%2005%20NSA%20letter.pdf


See also, the following two documents:

http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo12139.htm

http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-12949.htm
 
Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger Pro™