WALL STREET JOURNAL
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE
THE WEEKLY STANDARD
DRUDGE REPORT
THE WASHINGTON POST
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
NEW YORK TIMES


*=recently updated





Matthew Hoy currently works as a metro page designer at the San Diego Union-Tribune.

The opinions presented here do not represent those of the Union-Tribune and are solely those of the author.

If you have any opinions or comments, please e-mail the author at: hoystory -at- cox -dot- net.

Dec. 7, 2001
Christian Coalition Challenged
Hoystory interviews al Qaeda
Fisking Fritz
Politicizing Prescription Drugs

RSS FEED
<< current


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More













A note on the Amazon ads: I've chosen to display current events titles in the Amazon box. Unfortunately, Amazon appears to promote a disproportionate number of angry-left books. I have no power over it at this time. Rest assured, I'm still a conservative.



Thursday, October 06, 2005
Finally: Today's New York Times finally runs an article on the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Commitee's illegal accesssing of Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele's credit report, more than two weeks after the story first broke.

But the article is really a case study on spin -- how to provide all the facts, but mislead and obsfucate in order to protect their ideological friends. The story is written as a horse race piece and not a hard news crime/scandal piece. You don't find out that there is a criminal investigation until the seventh graf. Talk about burying the lede. Frankly, if a first year journalism student turned this into me they'd probably get a D. It's well written, but the story is out of order.

The headline:


Democrats Are on Defensive in Maryland Senate Race


This headline is written to guarantee that you don't read any farther. It communicates nothing. It's boring. Dull. You probably don't want to read the story. The lede:


National Republicans, who face an uphill battle in their efforts to capture the open United States Senate seat in heavily Democratic Maryland next year, are trying to exploit potential legal problems that Democrats are now suddenly facing in that race.


Ah, you made it past the headline, let us see if we can put you to sleep before you go any further. "Potential legal problems?" Boring. Read no further.


The Republicans are seizing on a disclosure that two researchers at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee improperly obtained the credit report of Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, a Republican who is considering a bid for the Senate seat.


Dang! You read the next paragraph. This is a soft-peddled lede. We've got to mention this, but we would rather you not think to hard on it. You see, they "improperly obtained the credit report." If this were Republicans we would've used the term "illegally." We make Republicans look bad, but not Democrats.


In recent days, Republicans have sought to put Democrats on the defensive, saying the incident underscores just how concerned the opposition is to the prospect of a Steele candidacy.

"He is very popular and Democrats have been at his heels since he announced his exploratory committee," said Dan Ronayne, a spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

For their part, Democrats describe the incident as an isolated event that Republicans are focusing on for political gain.


Have you forgot about the credit report yet? Good. See, nothing more to read here. It's just a he said/she said political thing. You can stop reading now.


Mr. Steele, the first black elected official to hold statewide office in Maryland, is considered a rising Republican star. Republicans from President Bush down have reportedly urged him to run ever since Senator Paul S. Sarbanes, a Democrat, announced he would not seek re-election after nearly three decades in office.


This is the obligatory, who is this Steele guy and why is he running paragraph. You can stop reading now. Please.


The two sides have been battling since late last month, when it was disclosed that the United States attorney's office for the District of Columbia and the F.B.I. were investigating the possibility that Mr. Steele's credit report was obtained illegally by the two Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee staff members.


See, this is really not important, because we here at the Times have been ignoring it for a couple of weeks. If it were important, we would've told you sooner.


Democrats contend that the incident was nothing more than a lapse in judgment by the two researchers, who were suspended in July after reporting what they had done to senior officials at the committee. The two are Katie Barge, who was the committee's research director, and Lauren Weiner, her deputy, according to officials.

Phil Singer, a spokesman for the committee, said that the two women subsequently resigned and that committee officials immediately turned the matter over to the United States attorney's office. He said the credit report was never circulated and was destroyed.

"The D.S.C.C. handled this incident in an exemplary way," Mr. Singer said. "The D.S.C.C. regretted that this incident occurred and has apologized to Mr. Steele."


Why are you still reading this article? You see, everything is fine. The Democrats are terribly sorry about the whole incident, now go back to eating your breakfast. Is that an Einstein Bros. bagel? Are you going to eat it?


Channing D. Phillips, spokesman for the federal prosecutor's office, confirmed that committee officials reported the incident in July. He would not comment on the specifics of the investigation, including whether it was limited to the two former staff members.


See, we talked to the prosecutor. Covering all our bases. Could you please stop reading now?


It is illegal to obtain a credit report under false pretenses. The maximum penalty for doing so is two years in prison and a $250,000 fine.


Ugh. Pretty serious crime, huh? If Republicans had done this, we certainly would've put this up higher.


Republicans have claimed that Democrats were seeking to smear Mr. Steele because his candidacy could seriously threaten Democratic hopes for the Senate seat.

"It certainly demonstrates their fear of a potential Michael Steele candidacy," said Mr. Ronayne, the spokesman for the Republican committee, who added that Democrats were trying to minimize the matter.

Mr. Steele has denounced the episode. "It tells you the depths to which some folks will go to try to win," he said during a recent appearance on a radio program, according to published reports.


Of course Republicans would say this sort of stuff, but we put it down here to make our liberal readers feel good. After all, they stopped reading after the D.S.C.C. spokesman said they were terribly sorry. We let the Republicans yammer just for faux balance.


Last week, five Republican senators wrote to the head of the committee, Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, and asked him for assurances that the committee had not obtained their personal credit information. The committee responded that it had not.


Schumer? That must be a misprint. We here at the New York Times are sure our buddy Chuck had nothing to do with this. Besides, newspaper surveys show that only a fraction of one percent of people read the entire story. Hey, Chuck! Who loves ya baby?

2:03 AM

Comments:
But the article is really a case study on spin -- how to provide all the facts, but mislead and obsfucate in order to protect their ideological friends. That reminds me of what Malcolm Muggeridge (I think it was) said about Pravda: they could publish a story that got in all the facts but still left out the truth.
 
Hey! Do you mean to tell me that the NY Times is trying to shield Democrat crimes? Hold the presses!

Next, you'll tell me that they have yet to cover the Air America scandal!
 
Hoy, you are much too charitable. You really only need to read the 1st sentence in each graf to get the bulk of this 2 week old story

Democrats Are on Defensive in Maryland Senate Race
--It starts the Dems are defensive (silly LOCAL Maryland Dems not the NY camera hog Senator within Dem party leadership)

National Republicans, who face an uphill battle in their efforts to capture the open United States Senate seat
---you see it's really all about the Repub...Dems are not facing a battle, let alone uphill, so therefore have no real ill motive or bad intentions, just run of the mill campaign tactics to combat the meany repubs, natch

The Republicans are seizing on a disclosure
--again the meany repubs seeking to exploit a silly criminal act. You know Repub and their "noise machine", can't help themselves to make a big deal out of this

In recent days, Republicans have sought to put Democrats on the defensive
---in case you don't get it by now, 3 times a charm, the repubs are opportunistic message machines trying their hardest to feign outrage that Dems illegally obtain private info only TO HURT DEMS. God do these repubs have ANY scruples?

For their part, Democrats describe the incident as an isolated event that Republicans are focusing on for political gain.
---opps, too soon. a 4th time. NYTimes treating their blue state readers like red staters? this is odd.

The two sides have been battling since late last month, when it was disclosed that the United States attorney's office for the District of Columbia and the F.B.I. were investigating the possibility that Mr. Steele's credit report
--wow a 5th time. Repubs are treating this like a boxing match. Quit exploiting this!

Democrats contend that the incident was nothing more than a lapse in judgment by the two researchers
---See we've told you this is all about the repubs seizing an opportunity to trash Dems, so here's the proof! DEMs are contending, for goodness sakes!

Phil Singer, a spokesman for the committee, said that the two women subsequently resigned
---2 bad eggs, thats all...(NYTimes, should we include the background the Schumers is paying their $400 attorney? really irrelevant since they resigned with pay--oops what about the pay? ah--not important)

"The D.S.C.C. handled this incident in an exemplary way," Mr. Singer said.
---Dems are so good and honest. Repubs really should take some lessons. Dems really should be rewared for their independent self congradulatory dealings on this.

It is illegal to obtain a credit report under false pretenses.
---oh i guess we should tell you what the point of all this is, well even though they didn't mean anything by it, it is, technically speaking, illegal

Republicans have claimed that Democrats were seeking to smear Mr. Steele
---oh for goodness sakes. Repubs claim all kinds of dishonest things. They really should be praising Schumer and Mr. Singer, what jerks...See sentence 1
 
Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger Pro™