*=recently updated

Matthew Hoy currently works as a metro page designer at the San Diego Union-Tribune.

The opinions presented here do not represent those of the Union-Tribune and are solely those of the author.

If you have any opinions or comments, please e-mail the author at: hoystory -at- cox -dot- net.

Dec. 7, 2001
Christian Coalition Challenged
Hoystory interviews al Qaeda
Fisking Fritz
Politicizing Prescription Drugs

<< current

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A note on the Amazon ads: I've chosen to display current events titles in the Amazon box. Unfortunately, Amazon appears to promote a disproportionate number of angry-left books. I have no power over it at this time. Rest assured, I'm still a conservative.

Wednesday, September 08, 2004
The (not-so) final word: Today's Boston Globe article on President Bush's National Guard service during the Vietnam era is Exhibit A in a double standard in the mainstream media.

Let's set aside for a moment that Bush has ordered the Pentagon to make available to the press all of his military service records and Sen. John Kerry has not. Let's also set aside the fact that the mainstream media doesn't seem to care about that disparity in transparency.

The Boston Globe has determined that there is something to the "Bush was AWOL" charge -- or as they put it "fell short on duty" -- and demonstrated this by putting their "Spotlight Team" on it.

One of the individuals quoted by the Globe reporters is Gerald A. Lechliter, a retired Army colonel, who has dissected Bush's service records piece by piece and determined that Bush didn't do his duty in the military.

The following analysis of President Bush’s (“Bush”) military records and the controlling legal authorities shows the following beyond any reasonable doubt:

v The pay records released by the White House this past winter prove Bush received unauthorized, i.e., fraudulent, payments for inactive duty training, even if he did show up for duty.

v The memorandum from Lieutenant Colonel (Retired) Albert C. Lloyd, who affirmed for the White House that Bush met his retention/retirement year point requirement, is an obfuscation, or outright deception, that disregarded Bush’s failure to meet the statutory and regulatory fiscal year satisfactory participation requirement.

v Bush’s superiors in the Texas Air National Guard failed to take required regulatory actions when Bushed missed required training and failed to take his flight physical.

v Despite seemingly laudatory comments, Bush’s May 1972 officer performance report was a clear and unmistakable indication that his performance had declined from the annual 1971 report. The report was the kiss of death before he left for Alabama that year.

v Bush did not meet the requirements for satisfactory participation from 1972 to 1973.

So, what have the Globe and Lechliter done? They've looked at all the documents, determined that they are not to be taken at face value and reinterpreted them as they see fit.

The rules say that Bush has to accumulate at least 50 points a year to meet his National Guard service requirements. Every year he is in the Guard, including while serving in Alabama, he earns more than 50 points -- but he doesn't earn them the right way. So, Bush was AWOL. It's irrelevant, they claim, that Bush received an honorable discharge -- he didn't deserve one.

Now, I'm not saying that their analysis is right or wrong -- Bush isn't running on his National Guard service so it really doesn't matter.

However, when it comes to Sen. John Kerry's service, the official records are the final word when it comes to accuracy.

If the official after action reports say that John Kerry's PCF was taking fire as he scooped Jim Rassman out of a river, then first-person accounts to the contrary are "unsubstantiated" and "false." Why? Because official papers say so.

If it's not a "smear" to question Bush's military record, then it's certainly not a "smear" to question Kerry's.

If Bush's military records are subject to reinterpretation 30+ years later, then Kerry's military records should be subject to reinterpretation 30+ years later.

Is the mainstream media carrying water for the Kerry campaign? I'd have to say so.

7:09 PM

Have you been living in a cave and not ventured out in the past month and a half? John Kerry's records have been scrutinized for quite a while. Indeed, the Swift Boats for Truth group has paid for airtime and has had their ad aired (for free, no less) by dozens of televisions stations around the country. Your article, "The (not-so) final word", is replete with misinformation and is geared to mislead your readership. It is an unfortunate time when you must resort to the same tactics of obfuscation and deceit like those who have come before you in the conservative circle with which you associate.
The previous comment states that John Kerry's records have been under review for quite a while, but those are only the records that John Kerry has released. Bush signed the SF-180 authorizing the release of ALL his records, and it is high time that Kerry did the same.

Isn't it ironic that Kerry, running for office based on what he did in Vietnam (he can't run on his political career), has NOT signed the SF-180 while Bush, who is running on his record as President, HAS signed the SF-180?

Your comment makes Matthew's point. There are questions about Kerry's record, which the ordinary press has apparently not seen fit to investigate (much less commit a "Spotlight" team to)---it required a private group (SBVT) to dig out the information on Cambodia, etc.


Key question, to my mind, is why there is an Army rather than an Air National Guard guy doing the commenting. This might seem like a minor issue, but the Army and the Air Force, in the regular forces, are not the same. More to the point, terminology, terms of service, obligations, are not the same between the two. Consequently, it would seem that there is a real question, to my mind, of whether Lechliter's comments, even if made in good faith, are necessarily accurate, as it pertains to the Air National Guard of the 1960s.
posted by Anonymous : 9:12 PM says:
"Have you been living in a cave and not ventured out in the past month and a half? John Kerry's records have been scrutinized for quite a whileReally? How can that be if he hasn't realeased them?
I dare Kerry to release them.
As far as your general goes, less than honest,which makes his use of millitary rank dishonerable. Plus he has based his assuptions of fake doccuments, which makes his "study" worthless. not only that, he's navy, not air force.
And not only that, he even quotes AFM and AFR regulations incorrectly, because he simply doesn't know the difference between the two.

LechLitre should try revieving ALL of kerry's record, and try tell me he is in any way shape or form a "war hero'
he won't, because that is too big of a lie for even SCUM like lechlitre to tell.

What a disgrace.
Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger Pro™