WALL STREET JOURNAL
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE
THE WEEKLY STANDARD
DRUDGE REPORT
THE WASHINGTON POST
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
NEW YORK TIMES


*=recently updated





Matthew Hoy currently works as a metro page designer at the San Diego Union-Tribune.

The opinions presented here do not represent those of the Union-Tribune and are solely those of the author.

If you have any opinions or comments, please e-mail the author at: hoystory -at- cox -dot- net.

Dec. 7, 2001
Christian Coalition Challenged
Hoystory interviews al Qaeda
Fisking Fritz
Politicizing Prescription Drugs

RSS FEED
<< current


Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More













A note on the Amazon ads: I've chosen to display current events titles in the Amazon box. Unfortunately, Amazon appears to promote a disproportionate number of angry-left books. I have no power over it at this time. Rest assured, I'm still a conservative.



Monday, May 09, 2005
He's a socialist: If there was any doubt before, it can be set to rest now, The New York Times' columnist Paul Krugman is a socialist.

Krugman -- still lacking a Social Security plan of his own -- assails the president for suggesting what amounts to means-testing of the proverbial "safety net." Krugman charges the president for being insincere about wanting to protect this safety net for the poor because his tax breaks have benefited mainly the rich.

Let's ignore for a second that President Bush was criticized by The Wall Street Journal because his tax cuts removed hundreds of thousands of the very poor from the tax rolls altogether -- individuals the paper called "Lucky Duckies". The Journal earned Krugman's scorn for that same editorial.

Krugman is mixing tax policy and social insurance. Unless one is willing to use taxation as a means to redistribute wealth -- then any efforts to make sure the the lower economic classes don't become poverty-stricken in their old age is seen as insincere at best and hypocritical at worst by Krugman.

4:39 AM

Comments:
Much the most fun thing is that Krugman actually gets his math wrong.
The guy on $60k in the example makes out really well.
http://timworstall.typepad.com/timworstall/2005/05/krugmans_number.html
 
Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger Pro™